Are the Red Arrows’ CO2 emissions worth it?

Polls

4th October 2024

The Red Arrows used more than 2.6 million litres of jet fuel in the last year, leading to 12,746 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions – the same as driving a petrol car from London to Glasgow and back more than 70,000 times.

The RAF’s acrobatic display team was formed 60 years ago and performs at air shows and military events across the world.

Military officials say that the Red Arrows “are one of the ways the UK strengthens its relationships abroad,” and says that the team helps to support British industry.

But all of this publicity for the UK is coming at a high cost to the climate and the air that we breathe, and at a time when the public are being asked to reduce the number of flights that they take, to help protect the climate.

The RAF doesn’t publicise these figures – we only found out by sending what’s known as an FOI (freedom of information) request to the Ministry of Defence, which told us that “the RAF is working to reduce its carbon footprint”.

Are the Red Arrows’ CO2 emissions worth it?

4 Comments

Leave a Reply

opsm909 · 1 month ago

It is good only for special occasions. We don't want the environment to be ruined completely.

crokshanks · 1 month ago

I don't know what to say as ..........
1) they really look pretty
BUT
2) they are bad for the climate and we need to focus on stopping global warming

I said no as I am eco friendly

thirdnews · 1 month ago

The Red Arrows do look amazing! 🤩 ✈️ But I don’t think it is worth it if it means destroying the planet. 🌍

byzbee33 · 1 month ago

I think for state occasions thats fine, but otherwise, then its got to be a NO, we like them, but we do have to think about the planet.